ABSTRACT
Background: Myocarditis after SARS-CoV2 infection or vaccination is rare, but seems to be relatively more frequent in young population. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T2 weighted sequences have the potential to detect subclinical myocarditis. However, there is paucity of data on the potential myocardial involvement after SARS-CoV2 infection or vaccination in asymptomatic adolescents. Purpose(s): To evaluate the presence of subclinical myocardial damage in adolescents who were infected with SARS-CoV2 or vaccinated against SARS-CoV2 using non-contrast CMR imaging. Method(s): Asymptomatic adolescents enrolled in the Early ImaginG Markers of unhealthy lifestyles in Adolescents (EnIGMA) project were scanned using a 3-Tesla CMR scanner between March 2021 and October 2021. CMR scans included CINE imaging and myocardial T2-mapping sequences. SARS-CoV2 IgG antibody testing was performed in capillary blood samples, and date of confirmed SARS-CoV2 infection and/or vaccination if any was collected. Participants were assigned to three different groups according to SARS-CoV2 status: Group 1 (non-infected and nonvaccinated), Group 2 (infected and non-vaccinated), and Group 3 (vaccinated, independently of past infection status). CMR images were analyzed by experienced observers blinded to adolescent's SARS-CoV2 status. ANOVA and multiple regression analysis, together with correlation coefficients, were used to study between-group differences and associations among variables of interest. Result(s): A total of 115 adolescents with a mean age of 16.0 years (standard deviation (SD)=0.4), 54% girls, completed the CMR study and SARSCoV2 data successfully, and were assigned to Group 1 (n=72), Group 2 (n=22), and Group 3 (n=21). Left and right ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF/RVEF) did not significantly differ among groups: Mean LVEF was 62.8% (SD=4.1), 63.0% (SD=3.7) and 60.9% (SD=3.9) [p=0.12] and mean RVEF was 56.5% (SD=4.2), 56.5% (SD=5.5) and 54.5% (SD=5.1) [p=0.23] in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Similarly, there were no between-group significant differences in myocardial T2 relaxation values: Mean T2 values were 44.1 ms (SD=2.2), 44.1 ms (SD=1.8) and 44.4 ms (SD=1.9) in Groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.63) (Figure 1). No differences were found either after adjusting for age and gender. Median time (interquartile range) from date of infection or vaccination to CMR acquisition was 133 (121) days and 28 (38) days in Group 2 and Group 3, respectively. No correlation between time from infection/vaccination to CMR acquisition and T2 values was detected (Figure 2). Conclusion(s): This observational study did not find evidence of subclinical myocardial involvement after SARS-CoV2 infection or vaccination in asymptomatic adolescents, as assessed with T2-mapping magnetic resonance imaging.
ABSTRACT
Background: L is a novel anticancer agent that inhibits trans-activated transcription and modulates the tumor microenvironment. L is approved by the FDA for metastatic SCLC patients (pts) with progressive disease (PD) on or after platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). The LUPER study is assessing the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of L+P as second-line regimen for SCLC pts after failure of platinum- based CT. Phase 1 data are presented here. Methods: In this phase 1/2 trial (NCT04358237), adult pts with histologically confirmed SCLC, PD to a previous CT-containing regimen (≥4 weeks before study initiation), no prior exposure to immunotherapy, ECOG PS of 0-1, and measurable disease as per RECIST 1.1 are eligible. Pts with treated, stable, and asymptomatic brain metastases (BMs) are allowed. A 3+3 dose-escalation was done to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of L+P. L was dosed at 2.4 mg/m2 and 3.2 mg/m2 IV Q3W in the dose level (DL)1 and 2, respectively, in combination with fixed dose of P (200 mg IV Q3W). The RP2D was the highest DL at which 0/3 pts or ≤1/6 pts experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first cycle. Treatment was administered until PD, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Secondary endpoints include safety as per CTCAE 5.0, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics. Results: Thirteen pts were enrolled across 3 hospitals in Spain (DL1, n = 7;DL2, n = 6). Median age was 66 (range 43-78) years, 46.2% were female, 61.5% had ECOG PS of 1, 38.5% had platinum-free interval < 90 days, 30.8% had LDH > upper normal limit, and 15.4% had BMs. One DLT (G3 asthenia) and one G4 neutropenia lasting > 3 days (controlled with G-CSF prophylaxis upon C2, without requiring dose delay or modification) occurred in the DL1. No DLT were reported in the DL2. The RP2D was identified as 3.2 mg/m2 L and 200 mg P IV Q3W. At data cutoff (Jan 21, 2022), 5 (38.4%) pts remained on treatment (1 pt in DL1 discontinued due to COVID-19 in cycle 1). Median duration of treatment was 2.1 (0-11.8) months, 5 (38.5%) pts had ≥8 cycles, and median relative dose intensity of L and P were 91.1% and 95.7%, respectively. Immune-related AEs (G2 pneumonitis;G3 ALT increased) led to P discontinuation in 2 (15.4%) pts. Responses were shown in both DLs, with ORR of 30.8% (1 confirmed complete response and 3 partial responses);3 pts had stable disease (SD;including 1 patient with SD > 12 weeks) and 5 (38.5%) pts experienced PD. Conclusions: This is the first report to demonstrate a manageable safety profile and preliminary efficacy of second-line L+P for relapsed SCLC pts. This combination warrants further confirmation in the ongoing expansion phase 2.
ABSTRACT
Beginning in December 2019 and still ongoing, the world's science, culture, and politics began to produce previously unimaginable daily quantities of data to understand the nature of covid-19 and its effects on our lives. These collective efforts represent a change in the quality and quantity of what it is being produced and published. This allows us to observe the covid-19 shock based on a variety of clinical, social, and economic data published with unthinkable speed. The objective of this article is to understand the relationship between information and political science in the current context, describe the agendas generated by the covid-19 crisis, and discuss how professional demands promise to accelerate new forms of collaboration in political science, the collaboration with other disciplines, as well as the inequalities that this change generates.
ABSTRACT
The consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have exceeded any forecast made. Today we know that the level of severity of the infection in its initial stages will correspond to the evolution and the presence of sequelae in the future. There are no specific treatments that have shown sufficient evidence to allow their recommendation, especially in the mild-moderate stages of the disease. The anti-Covid vaccination is showing clear benefits, both in the prevention of the disease and in its evolution, with the consequent improvement in the numbers of those affected by the pandemic. The use of different drugs used in other indications has been proposed as possible beneficial treatments for COVID-19 that, if used, will be prescribed individually taking into account the characteristics and situation of the patient, the evolutionary phase of the disease as well as well as the limitations of the lack of evidence in its administration.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Humans , Pandemics , Primary Health Care , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The original table 1 of this article was missing some cells and data. The corrected table is the following. (Table Presented). © 2021 Cambridge University Press. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
COVID-19 behaves like a heterogeneous disease. Some patients may develop dyspnea-free hypoxemia during its evolution (silent hypoxemia). Pulse oximetry plays a crucial role in detecting hypoxemia in these patients, especially when they remain at home. Patients with SpO2 levels ≤ 92% or desaturations ≥ 3% after exercise test require hospital admission. Progressive saturation declines reaching SpO2 levels < 96% require strict clinical assessment (radiological study, blood test) for which it will be sent to a health center.